Western Rifle Shooters Association
This time, we get to be the Indians.
I would consider this in concert with a wider team. Ability to operate in 3 man teams that are already trained and planning to operate within a larger contingent. They ability to come together, as needed, and separate as needed into 3’s. That’s the context in which I would consider this info.
All good but until something big happens , no dice. I can barely get fuckers in my circle to confirm zero or run through a few AQTs. The learning curve is going to be hyperbolic.
The way the Jihadi enemy among others were able to use fragmented groups distrustful of another was networks. There is a lesson here, a network doesn’t expose its own internal workings to another network, it simply builds a narrow link and transacts only as needed.
A good example is this page, I’m using an “alias” and am on as secure a link as practical, as I’m sure all of you are as well.
As far as the ability of networks to scale to any size needed – see The Internet, or for that matter your home wifi network – I’m sure its password protected.
In the case of the putative Right Wing – it does not exist, not as the Left does. Nor does anyone trust a stranger, certainly not one met online. None should.
However the answer to how to bring together an atomized large body of men who have very legitimate trust/untrust issues – you’re holding an example of the solution in your hand. > no – not the solution, but if the principles of networking above and those we all use daily are learned and applied – a solution.
The solution to our only real problem – atomization, negligible real world power – is networks.
**no, of course you shouldn’t trust anyone you meet online.
I like Mah’s blog so far, thanks.
3 can keep a secret if 2 of them are dead
Comments are closed.